Asumani Basalirwa’s Contradiction: From Legislative Defender to Parliamentary Dissenter

While presenting a motion to introduce his bill criminalizing homosexuality, Asumani Basalirwa vehemently argued that he was acting on behalf of the Ugandan public, who were seeking legislative protection against those preying on Ugandan children.

Many Ugandans saw Basalirwa as a true defender of their values and cheered him on. The public stood firmly with him despite ridicule, intimidation, and attacks. MPs also supported him, ensuring his bill passed and became law.

Ugandans, regardless of creed, tribe, political views, or socioeconomic status, continue to support the legislation against homosexuality, which has elevated Basalirwa’s visibility and credibility nationally.

It is surprising, then, that the same MP Basalirwa is now threatening to drag his colleagues to court over a disagreement regarding the censure of the four Parliamentary Commissioners.

What Basalirwa might be forgetting is that the MPs leading the censure likely have gauged public sentiment. The same Ugandan public that supported Basalirwa’s Anti-Homosexuality Bill, in defense of cultural values, is now supporting the censure movement, aimed at combating corruption and abuse of office.

The question to Hon. Basalirwa is why, when he had a burning agenda, he relied on public and parliamentary support, but now, when his colleagues pursue a similar process, he is vehemently opposing it, even threatening legal action.

One might wonder if Basalirwa believes he has a special status in Parliament, feeling his views must be followed, and is ready to disrupt the process if they are not.

Different MPs have varied opinions on the issue of the Commissioners awarding themselves large sums as service awards. However, the current process offers dissenting MPs the option not to sign, a more civil approach envisioned in the Parliamentary Rules. There is no need for altercations over gathering signatures.

If the required number of signatures is obtained, the motion will be formally presented to the entire House, where procedural concerns can be addressed. The presiding officer will ensure proper guidance according to the Rules.

Therefore, it is unnecessary and excessive for Basalirwa to issue threats to fellow MPs.